/p/2026-10-15 · explainer
Paper explainer · 2610.15897 · Zhang and Shrestha

Review added 33 points. It still lost to one call.

Hand one model’s answer to another model for review and accuracy climbs — 33.2 points on one pairing — because you are measuring against the weaker model that wrote the answer. Measured against the stronger of the two, called once by itself, review won in 9 of 96 pairings, finished about 3.1 points below it on average, and cost 2.6 to 2.8 times as much. The reviewer is not verifying. It is handing over its own knowledge, and deferring to the answer already in front of it.

01 · The problem

Two gains, and the one everybody reports

who reviews whom

02 · The mechanism

The reviewer keeps the answer in front of it

03 · The evidence

Nine wins in ninety-six tries

pick an outcome to read it

04 · Why I care

Same two calls, spent differently

05 · Apply it

Your two-model pipeline illustrative

Results

What the paper actually measured

What it does not show

In practice